Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Robert Many thanks for your generosity. As it turns out, it won't be necessary to submit your name for the clearance. I hope you're enjoying the long weekend and give my best to Noelle! Lolita --- On Sun, 8/26/12, Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> wrote: From: Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> Subject: Re: background check? To: "Lolita" <http://www.sbcglobal.net/~fatildro> Date: Sunday, August 26, 2012, 6:48 PM To: Lolita <http://www.sbcglobal.net/~fatildro> Yeah, it's fine. Good luck! > From: Lolita <http://www.sbcglobal.net/~fatildro> > Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:05:56 -0700 (PDT) > > Hi Robert > I hope you and Noelle are well. I'm needing to renew my clearance for another > > agency. I should have received this information two weeks ago, however the > guy > handing it did not prioritize getting the paperwork started so I'm rushing to > > try and complete the forms. I am due to start the assignment Sept 4th and > need > to complete the form today. > > I hope you would allow me to put down your name as verifier as you so kindly > agreed before. > > Please let me know if this is okay with you. I hope to complete and submit > the > form today. > > Thanks again, > Lolita > > --- On Sun, 6/13/10, Lolita <http://www.sbcglobal.net/~fatildro> wrote: > > From: Lolita <http://www.sbcglobal.net/~fatildro> > Subject: Re: background check? > To: "Robert" <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> > Date: Sunday, June 13, 2010, 7:24 PM > > Thanks Robert, I really appreciate it! > > --- On Sun, 6/13/10, Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> wrote: > > From: Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> > Subject: Re: background check? > To: "Lolita" <http://www.sbcglobal.net/~fatildro> > Date: Sunday, June 13, 2010, 3:30 PM > > OK, then. > > Go ahead and use me as a reference. Use my my-Oakland-voicemail-number phone number. > Our current physical address is > > . > where-I-live > > Good luck. > > > From: Lolita <http://www.sbcglobal.net/~fatildro> > > Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 12:50:27 -0700 (PDT) > > > > Hi Robert > > I can totally understand. I think it is just the clearance level > > which is slightly more in-depth than a background check. There are no > > forms to complete, as far as I understand, a government official > > would make contact and ask about your connection to me to get a sense > > of my character, make sure I'm not a " threat" in anyway, etc. It is > > standard procedure for this area. I've got a short list of > > approximately eight people as I'm aware that some folks may be a bit > > reluctant to have that type of interaction with the government. So > > its totally okay if you'd rather I didn't give your name - it would > > be good to know either way. > > > > Thanks > > Lolita > > > > --- On Sun, 6/13/10, Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> wrote: > > From: Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> > > Subject: Re: background check? > > To: "Lolita" <http://www.sbcglobal.net/~fatildro> > > Date: Sunday, June 13, 2010, 8:05 AM > > > > What kind of a government clearance process are you going through exactly? > > What form(s) are you filling out? > > > > I'd like to know before I agree to this. > > > > > From: Lolita <http://www.sbcglobal.net/~fatildro> > > > Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 21:57:59 -0700 (PDT) > > > > > > Hi Robert > > > I'm only just coming on line now, and hadn't sent out anything > > > previously. Just wanted to send a quick note to see if you're okay > > > to provide a " reference" for me for a government clearance process > > > that I'm going through. Let me know if that's okay, along with a > > > contact number, I'll need to give a physical address which I've got > > > for you as 614 2nd street in where-I-live. Otherwise, it's okay if > > > you'd rather not - given that we met back in 2004 I wanted to > > > provide someone whom I've known for more than five years. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Lolita