Re: background check?

[Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>]

Yeah, it's fine.

Good luck!

 > From: Lolita <http://www.sbcglobal.net/~fatildro>
 > Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
 >
 > Hi Robert
 > I hope you and Noelle are well. I'm needing to renew my clearance for another 
 > agency.  I should have received this information two weeks ago, however the guy 
 > handing it did not prioritize getting the paperwork started so I'm rushing to 
 > try and complete the forms. I am due to start the assignment Sept 4th and need 
 > to complete the form today.
 >  
 > I hope you would allow me to put down your name as verifier as you so kindly 
 > agreed before.  
 >  
 > Please let me know if this is okay with you. I hope to complete and submit the 
 > form today.
 >  
 > Thanks again,
 > Lolita
 >  
 > --- On Sun, 6/13/10, Lolita <http://www.sbcglobal.net/~fatildro> wrote:
 > 
 > From: Lolita <http://www.sbcglobal.net/~fatildro>
 > Subject: Re: background check?
 > To: "Robert" <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
 > Date: Sunday, June 13, 2010, 7:24 PM
 > 
 > Thanks Robert, I really appreciate it!
 > 
 > --- On Sun, 6/13/10, Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> wrote:
 > 
 > From: Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
 > Subject: Re: background check?
 > To: "Lolita" <http://www.sbcglobal.net/~fatildro>
 > Date: Sunday, June 13, 2010, 3:30 PM
 > 
 > OK, then.
 > 
 > Go ahead and use me as a reference.  Use my my-Oakland-voicemail-number phone number.
 > Our current physical address is
 > 
 >  .
 > where-I-live 
 > 
 > Good luck.
 > 
 > > From: Lolita <http://www.sbcglobal.net/~fatildro>
 > > Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 12:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
 > >
 > > Hi Robert
 > > I can totally understand.  I think it is just the clearance level
 > > which is slightly more in-depth than a background check. There are no
 > > forms to complete, as far as I understand, a government official
 > > would make contact and ask about your connection to me to get a sense
 > > of my character, make sure I'm not a " threat" in anyway, etc. It is
 > > standard procedure for this area.  I've got a short list of
 > > approximately eight people as I'm aware that some folks may be a bit
 > > reluctant to have that type of interaction with the government. So
 > > its totally okay if you'd rather I didn't give your name - it would
 > > be good to know either way.
 > >  
 > > Thanks
 > > Lolita
 > > 
 > > --- On Sun, 6/13/10, Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> wrote:
 > > From: Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
 > > Subject: Re: background check?
 > > To: "Lolita" <http://www.sbcglobal.net/~fatildro>
 > > Date: Sunday, June 13, 2010, 8:05 AM
 > > 
 > > What kind of a government clearance process are you going through exactly?
 > > What form(s) are you filling out?
 > > 
 > > I'd like to know before I agree to this.
 > > 
 > > > From: Lolita <http://www.sbcglobal.net/~fatildro>
 > > > Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 21:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
 > > >
 > > > Hi Robert
 > > > I'm only just coming on line now, and hadn't sent out anything
 > > > previously.  Just wanted to send a quick note to see if you're okay
 > > > to provide a " reference" for me for a government clearance process
 > > > that I'm going through.  Let me know if that's okay, along with a
 > > > contact number, I'll need to give a physical address which I've got
 > > > for you as 614 2nd street in where-I-live.  Otherwise, it's okay if
 > > > you'd rather not - given that we met back in 2004 I wanted to
 > > > provide someone whom I've known for more than five years.
 > > >  
 > > > Thanks!
 > > > Lolita