[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: attendees



Mom, I think you should pop up with the tags in hand without using Gail's
input.

[Noelle here]
I did not know Mary Trunk's husband Paul was not coming, so delete him.I
don't think name tags are necessary for me & R & Don & Gail.It's up to
you.

When we leave Sunday,we are probably taking Connie and 3.5 yr old son in
my car/Thought you would like to go with us.I'll let you know.

 > From: Noelle <http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg>
 > Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:19:24 -0800 (PST)
 >
 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 23:01:13 -0800
 > From: Gail <http://www.cox.net/~g3>
 > To: Noelle <http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg>
 > Subject: Re: attendees
 > 
 > Dear Noelle and Robert,
 >     Attached is the updated RSVP List where I have added the relationship of
 > the guest to you as the bride and groom to be included on the name tag. We
 > now have 55 attending including 4 children. Can you please forward this list
 > to Robert's Mom to make the name tags so the printing is large enough for
 > guests to easily read after you add in other relationships that I didn't
 > know of people coming. If Robert's Mom cannot do this, please let me know as
 > soon as possible, and I'll ask my Texas Brother-in-Law to do it. Since he
 > isn't invited to the reception, it would be nicer if Robert's Mother could
 > do it and then bring them with her when she arrives. In other words, each
 > name tag should have the person's name printed on it and underneath the
 > relationship to the Bride or Groom. If you can think of shorter better
 > wording than I have written regarding the relationships, that is fine.
 > Thanks,
 > Gail












Why do you want this page removed?