[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: attendees
- To: http://www.juno.com/~margaretch
- Subject: Re: attendees
- From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (Robert)
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:50:00 -0800
- Cc: Noelle <http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg>
- Keywords: http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg
Mom, I think you should pop up with the tags in hand without using Gail's
input.
[Noelle here]
I did not know Mary Trunk's husband Paul was not coming, so delete him.I
don't think name tags are necessary for me & R & Don & Gail.It's up to
you.
When we leave Sunday,we are probably taking Connie and 3.5 yr old son in
my car/Thought you would like to go with us.I'll let you know.
> From: Noelle <http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg>
> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:19:24 -0800 (PST)
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 23:01:13 -0800
> From: Gail <http://www.cox.net/~g3>
> To: Noelle <http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg>
> Subject: Re: attendees
>
> Dear Noelle and Robert,
> Attached is the updated RSVP List where I have added the relationship of
> the guest to you as the bride and groom to be included on the name tag. We
> now have 55 attending including 4 children. Can you please forward this list
> to Robert's Mom to make the name tags so the printing is large enough for
> guests to easily read after you add in other relationships that I didn't
> know of people coming. If Robert's Mom cannot do this, please let me know as
> soon as possible, and I'll ask my Texas Brother-in-Law to do it. Since he
> isn't invited to the reception, it would be nicer if Robert's Mother could
> do it and then bring them with her when she arrives. In other words, each
> name tag should have the person's name printed on it and underneath the
> relationship to the Bride or Groom. If you can think of shorter better
> wording than I have written regarding the relationships, that is fine.
> Thanks,
> Gail