Re: CVS weirdnesses (was port to Debian)

[robert b <http://www.yahoo.com/~robertdeveloper>]

--- Joe Picone - The Terminal Man <http://www.isip.msstate.edu/~picone> wrote:
> > Ah-ha!  This file is indeed completely different.  Thanks.
> > 
> 
> I have added the full logs from configure, make depend, make install,
> and make test to this page:
>
> http://www.isip.msstate.edu/projects/speech/software/tutorials/production/fundamentals/current/section_01/s01_05_p01.html

Thanks!
 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> -Joe

--- Joe Picone - The Terminal Man <http://www.isip.msstate.edu/~picone> wrote:
> > Ah-ha!  This file is indeed completely different.  Thanks.
> > 
> > I guess the next step for me is to figure out how to check the correct 
> > versions of files out of
> > CVS...
> 
> r00_n09 will compile with gcc 3.0.4; it will not compile yet with gcc 3.1.
> We are about to release an update for that.
> 
> Our current repository is not stable since we are close to a release
> of r00_n10.
> 
> -Joe

I am compiling right now and there are no errors or warnings.  I believe 
that the instructions
on

http://www.isip.msstate.edu/projects/speech/software/html/cvs_instructions.html

are incorrect.  In particular, I think this line:

cvs -d :pserver:http://www.ftp.isip.msstate.edu/~cvs:/isip/tools/cvsroot export -r isip_r00_n06

was the cause of my problems.  When I changed "isip_r00_n06" to
"isip_r00_n09", it works a lot better.
>From http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert  Mon Dec 16 12:07:32 1996
From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (robert)
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 12:07:16 -0800
In-Reply-To: <http://www./~v03007800aed4b7db8a33[204.188.37.128]>
References:  <http://www./~v03007800aed4b7db8a33[204.188.37.128]>
X-from: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (Robert)
Encrypt: on
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 alpha(3) 7/19/95)
To: "Les U. Knight" <http://www.vhemt.org/~les>
Subject: Re: VHEMT Decisions
Cc: http://www.teleport.com/~dkossy
Message-ID: <http://www.robert/~KBkDAtQFacAcRGqIFhAGgA>
Status: OR


 > From: "Les U. Knight" <http://www.vhemt.org/~les>
 > Date: Wed  Dec 11,  7:28pm
 >
 > >From Donna Kossy:
 > 
 > Les:
 > 
 > I was thinking about your comment that we make decisions based on emotions,
 > rather than on logic, and that we use logic to back up the decisions we've
 > already made (or something to that effect), and was reminded of my own
 > "reasons" for becoming a VHEMT Volunteer, which had nothing to do with
 > reasoning.
 > 
 > From the time I was 14 or so, I've viewed my ability to become pregnant
 > with horror. It was very clear to me that becoming pregnant and having a
 > baby would mean nothing less than total loss of freedom. I've never
 > considered having children, because I don't want them; I never had to
 > wrestle with any "dilemmas" or decisions about it. When I became a
 > Volunteer, it wasn't because of some rational decision that I made, that I
 > had to stop breeding to save the earth; it was because VHEMT gave me a good
 > reason for something I was already doing.
 > 
 > I'd be very curious to find out if there are any Volunteers out there who
 > really wanted to have children, but decided not to **solely** because of
 > VHEMT or some other overpopulation argument.
 > 
 > Donna Kossy
 > The Kooks Museum
 > PO Box 86663
 > Portland, OR 97286
 > 
 > http://www.teleport.com/~dkossy
 > 
 > (http://www.teleport.com/~dkossy)

I definitely decided not to have children for purely rational reasons.  It's
an overpopulation thing (as George B. would say) and that's what turned my
mind.  It was more out of "thought experiments" that I came to the conclusion
that the world is (and was, at the time) overpopulated -- that it's an
issue of resources per person.  Since that time, I have read more about this
stuff (through These Exit Times, "The Population Explosion", etc.) and have
realized that humans are managing to destroy the planet not just for ourselves,
but all the otherwise innocent creatures that inhabit it.

So, as with my vegan diet where I'm boycotting meat, dairy, etc., so with
my reproductive beliefs I'm boycotting conception.

            >> Tony Blair for president! <<
>> Those who seek easy answers get final solutions. <<