> From: http://www.ureach.com/~Slarty (zaphod) > Date: 11 Feb 2002 17:57:29 -0800 > > My idea of the perfect language would be something like any of the > four following: > > 1)Logo that concentrated on lisp tricks and didn't even HAVE > turtle-graphics > 2)Forth w/out all that OS STUFF, and stack STUFF. > 3)lisp without so many parentheses > 4)C without structured programming concepts > > Anyone got a good candidate? > > I'll even let you tell me how dumb I am for wanting what I want. > It seems that the common denominator of the four languages I like is > that they are all extensible, and I think all could be said to have > charachteristics of functional languages. > > Someone could make me extraordinarilly happy by a real nice thorough > analysis of my essentially stupid and trivial thought(s) here. You could use Logo in Scheme: http://www.colorstudy.com/static/ianb/old Logo is a language without parentheses (mostly). This implementation gives you the power of Scheme with the simple syntax of Logo.