You know, I'd be willing to give into Medicaid cuts if taxes were raised
to 40% on millionaires.
Of course, I would prefer 100% income tax on anybody making more then
$400,000, but not even FDR was able to do that.
> From: Noelle <noelle>
> Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 07:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
>
> F.F. in London, England, UK, asks: This is a super-interesting
> interview of Steve Bannon with the Financial Times. Among some of
> the usual right-wing things, he says he'd raise taxes on the rich to
> 40% above $1 million in income. Are you aware of other Republicans
> saying they'd like to tax the rich? Assuming this is his agenda,
> what do you think his motivation is?
>
> (V) & (Z) answer: Steve Bannon is not really a Republican. He's a
> right-wing populist who votes Republican because that's the major
> political party that most closely aligns with his worldview.
>
> Bannon is persuaded that the American system is badly broken, and
> that one of the reasons is that the people who have power (such as
> the wealthy) have co-opted virtually everything for their own
> benefit. So, smacking the rich upside the head with stiffer taxes is
> entirely on-brand for Bannon, even if he is only well-known because
> he rode the coattails of a billionaire.
>
> There are other Republicans talking about taxing the rich, including
> Trump himself. However, the ones who are saying it openly are doing
> so because taxing the very rich may be the only way to make the
> numbers work in Trump's "big, beautiful bill." If there are
> Republican officeholders who think, as Bannon does, that it's really
> time to tear the whole system down, they are not saying so openly.