[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: death rate
- To: noelle
- Subject: Re: death rate
- From: robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 12:37:30 -0700
- Keywords: our-Oakland-cell-phone-number
> From: Noelle <noelle>
> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 11:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
>
> but aren't the cruise ship guests skew toward elder, more old than
> general population?
That's a good point. It may be an example of a worse-case scenario.
Don't know.
> On Sat, 18 Apr 2020, robert wrote:
> > > From: Noelle <noelle>
> > > Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:36:35 -0700 (PDT)
> > >
> > > https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/17/us/coronavirus-death-rate.html
> >
> > It seems like you really care about the exposure fatal rate. So, with the
> > testing in South Korea and the case of the cruise ship seem like the best
> > models for this, which means that the IFR is between 1.6% and 2%. Which
> > is still ridiculously high. So, besides being very annoying, could lead
> > to death. Which is usually a bummer.