I could easily imagine Matt Taibbi making this argument. Of course, I have my doubts, but it is folly to ever doubt Ted... > From: Noelle <noelle> > Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 07:53:28 -0700 (PDT) > > > From: Ted<http://www.send.mailchimpapp.com/~tedrall.aol.com> > > Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 14:27:54 +0000 > > > > The Ted Rall Subscription Service > > Thank you for supporting independent political commentary > > Here is this week's column. Thanks for subscribing to the Ted Rall > > Subscription Service. > > > > Some Republicans see the Ukraine/Biden impeachment inquiry as a deep-state > > coup attempt against President Trump ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > 31cb9070a3&e=c3adcc1cdb) . Some progressives are beginning to scratch the > > surface of an alternative, but equally cynical, analysis that I think > > leftists ought to consider: > > The impeachment of Donald Trump is a DNC/centrist coup attempt against > > progressives inside the Democratic Party. > > Democrats could have launched impeachment proceedings over any number of > > more compelling issues: Trump’s child separation policy ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > 6d268abec4&e=c3adcc1cdb) at the border, the Muslim travel ban ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > 823e13d233&e=c3adcc1cdb) , emoluments ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > 73f5e26f79&e=c3adcc1cdb) , the president’s erratic behavior on social > > media ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > 53ed773305&e=c3adcc1cdb) . Why the Ukraine/Biden affair? > > The House inquiry is hardly ideal from a framing perspective. The only > > conceivable reason that the Ukrainian natural-gas company Burisma hired Vice > > President Biden’s screw-up ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > cfa197b92a&e=c3adcc1cdb) drug addict ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > 5626eda210&e=c3adcc1cdb) alcoholic ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > 85a64caccf&e=c3adcc1cdb) son, with zero experience in the energy sector, to > > sit on its board of directors for $50,000 a month was that he was the vice > > president’s son. Vox notes ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > f12287907c&e=c3adcc1cdb) that “the situation constituted the kind of > > conflict of interest that was normally considered inappropriate in > > Washington.” Pre-impeachment, no one knew about this sleaze. > > Knowing that his worthless son was working a no-show “job” there for a > > company brazenly trying to buy his influence, Vice President Biden ought to > > have been the last Obama Administration official to call the president of > > Ukraine about anything. Democratic leaders, corporatists to a man and firmly > > on team Biden, nonetheless are aware that their impeachment inquiry risks > > exposing their preferred candidate to the kind of scrutiny that can lose an > > election. > > Biden apologists like the New York Times’ resident conservative columnist > > Ross Douthat are furiously spinning the argument that Americans should > > ignore Biden’s corruption to focus on Trump’s worse corruption. “ > > Hypocrisy is better than naked vice, soft corruption is better than the more > > open sort, and what the president appears to have done in leaning on the > > Ukrainian government is much worse than Hunter Biden’s overseas > > arrangements,” argues ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > 6a90a4bd31&e=c3adcc1cdb) the Dout. But impeachment is a political, not a > > legal (or legalistic) process. We knew what Trump was when we elected him; > > this point goes to the president. > > So why go after Trump over Ukraine/Biden and not, say, the fact that he’s > > nuts? > > Risks aside, the Democrats’ Ukraine investigation transforms—not > > successfully, I think, but anyway, it tries—to rescue Biden’s flagging > > campaign ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > ba0b5f1bdf&e=c3adcc1cdb) by transforming him into a victim. Liberals love > > victim narratives. > > And now the crux: Elizabeth Warren. When Nancy Pelosi announced the > > impeachment inquiry, the self-styled progressive from Ma was > > rising in the polls so fast ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > 4f5c2df8dc&e=c3adcc1cdb) that many analysts, me included, believed that she > > had become the most likely nominee. I still do. That goes double following > > Bernie Sanders’ heart attack ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > 756a372339&e=c3adcc1cdb) , which fuels concerns about his age. > > As impeachment proceedings do, the current effort to sanction Trump— > > remember, odds of getting 67 senators to vote to remove him from office are > > exceedingly long—will dominate news coverage as long as they go on. It’s > > going to be impeachment, impeachment, impeachment, 24-7. > > The drone of impeachment will eclipse Warren’s remarkably disciplined ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > ca2c2e9c0c&e=c3adcc1cdb) campaign. She has a plan for everything ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > 542171be5b&e=c3adcc1cdb) but the media won’t cover them. Warren trails > > Biden on name recognition; how will voters get to know her? I’d be > > spitting bullets if I were her campaign manager. > > As I’ve written for The Wall Street Journal ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > d5309c1819&e=c3adcc1cdb) , progressive ideas are dominating the current > > presidential campaign cycle on the Democratic side. Most of the top > > candidates have endorsed Bernie Sanders’ key 2016 promises: free college, > > Medicare for All, $15 minimum wage. Nearly three out of four Democratic > > voters self-identify as progressives. > > Bernie lost the Battle of 2016 to Hillary Clinton but he won the war. > > Corporatists still control the DNC but the vast majority of Democrats lean > > left. Before Biden entered the 2020 campaign it seemed clear that four > > decades of Third Way/Democratic Leadership Council/New Democrats/Clintonite > > rule of the party was coming to an end. A progressive, either Sanders or > > Warren, would almost certainly be the nominee. > > Biden’s campaign is about one thing: blocking progressives. > > Samuel Moyn, interviewed ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > ac8d9e5c81&e=c3adcc1cdb) in Jacobin, sort of gets it. “[Democratic > > Congressman] Adam Schiff ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > e64859789b&e=c3adcc1cdb) and many others are not concerned about saving the > > Democratic Party from its historical errors, including its own disaster in > > 2016,” Moyn says. “If impeachment becomes a distraction from that much > > more pressing campaign to save the Democratic Party for the Left, then it > > will have been a disaster.” > > What better way for moderates to recapture control of the Democratic party > > than by impeaching Donald Trump? The impeachment brigade has progressive > > allies like AOC’s “squad.” But the pro-impeachment Democrats who are > > getting airtime on MSNBC ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > d06d454d4b&e=c3adcc1cdb) , unofficial broadcast organ of the Democratic > > Party, are the centrist/DNC “national security Democrats ( > > https://rall.us18.list-manage.com/track/click?u=317c94f76a09aa357140ea82c&id= > > 9c1e24a711&e=c3adcc1cdb) .” (Note the new/old branding. Scoop Jackson, > > call your office.) > > Impeaching Trump may not be a fiendishly clever conspiracy to recapture the > > Democratic Party from the left. It may simply work out that way—dumb luck > > for dumb corporatists. Regardless, pro-impeachment progressives are dupes. > > Why impeach Trump when it seems so unlikely to result in his removal from > > office? Why risk energizing and further unifying the Republican Party? > > As their backing of Hillary over the more popular Bernie in 2016 showed, the > > old DLC cabal is more interested in getting rid of the progressives in their > > own party than in defeating Donald Trump. Impeachment may not nominate, much > > less elect, Joe Biden. But it just might neutralize Elizabeth Warren.