[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NYTimes.com: Why Housing Policy Is Climate Policy
- To: Heather Howard <http://www.icloud.com/~hhoward40>, http://www.gmail.com/~hhoward40
- Subject: Re: NYTimes.com: Why Housing Policy Is Climate Policy
- From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (Robert)
- Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 08:14:00 -0700
- Cc: http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg
- Keywords: ifile: nonspam -1571.23378468 spam -1665.37123966 downloaded -2266.89556313 ---------
> From: Heather Howard <http://www.icloud.com/~hhoward40>
> Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 21:59:21 -0700
>
> From The New York Times:
>
> Why Housing Policy Is Climate Policy
>
> In Ca, where home prices are pushing people farther from their jobs,
> rising traffic is creating more pollution.
>
> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/25/opinion/ca-home-prices-climate.html
No doubt, this is true.
But, everyone ignores the United State military. That's what should
really be reformed.
https://sandiegofreepress.org/2014/11/the-us-military-is-a-major-contributor-to-global-warming/
"The US military is the largest single consumer of energy in the world. If
it were a country, the Department of Defense (DoD) would rank 34th in the
world in average daily oil use, coming in just behind Iraq and just ahead
of Sweden."