[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ken Burns¢ Vietnam War: An Object Lesson in the Failures of the Objective Lens (fwd)
- To: noelle
- Subject: Re: Ken Burns¢ Vietnam War: An Object Lesson in the Failures of the Objective Lens (fwd)
- From: robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 09:19:07 -0700
- Keywords: my-Oakland-voicemail-number
> From: Noelle <noelle>
> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
>
> Good critique. Also, I do agree why does he label the interviewees,
> especially the Vietnamese,without enough context?
Seems like Ken Burns wanted to wait 'til the final frames to drop the
bombs on who these people were.
> Like that younger N
> Vietnamese guy who was 10 in 1962(it sounds like he's a historian).
> why did they only have a critique of Jane Fonda in Hanoi? they didn't
> mention Chomsky,Zinn & Doug Dowd going, to add context as to why she and
> they went.
Good question. But, I think it was appropriate to play the broadcast
where Jane Fonda was advocating that the POWs be executed.
> But overall, he did do a good job. We can't have an objective documentary
> yet not until everyone who remembers that era is dead.
It is kinda funny that there was hardly a mention of why the United States
was against communism. I mean, do young people even remember what
Communism is?
> > From: FAIR<http://www.fair.org/~fair>
> > Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 17:31:20 +0000
> >
[snip]