Re: Comment on Tech Companies Sever Business Ties with Hate Groups. But Should They? (fwd)

[robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>]

Not sure what this has to do with the topic, but interesting nevertheless.

 > From: Noelle <noelle>
 > Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 11:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
 >
 >  > From: "Disqus" <http://www.disqus.net/~notifications>
 >  > Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 18:29:44 -0000
 >  > 
 >  > Curious wrote, in response to Noelle:
 >  > 
 >  > If this is the law you are referring to, it is 100% accurate.
 >  > 
 >  > Under a law that went into effect in July, physicians in South Dakota must 
 >  > tell any woman seeking an abortion that she is terminating the life of â??a 
 >  > whole, separate, unique, living human beingâ?? with whom she has an â??
 >  > existing relationship,â?? that her relationship â??enjoys protection under 
 >  > the United States Constitution and under the laws of South Dakota,â?? and 
 >  > that abortion terminates that relationship along with â??her existing 
 >  > constitutional rights with regards to that relationship.â??
 >  > 
 >  > Noelle wrote:
 >  > 
 >  > But what about the conservative anti-abortion state legislation that 
 >  > mandates  a doctor read a script about abortion that contains non-medically 
 >  > proven assertions of abortion complications? Is that infringing on the 
 >  > doctor's free speech? Or since it's about saving life it's OK?