[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: evote - Invitation to edit (fwd)
- To: robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Subject: Re: evote - Invitation to edit (fwd)
- From: Noelle <noelle>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 16:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
- User-agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
> From: Lisa Ann <http://www.gmail.com/~lisaann>
> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:56:36 -0700
> Cc: Emy Mendoza <http://www.gmail.com/~mendoza.emy>, Chris Mengarelli <
> http://www.mengarelliott.com/~chris>
>
> Looks like I agree with Noelleâ??s husband â?¦ having looked at
> these
> solutions, and a few others (incl
> http://www.simplyvoting.com ,http://www.simplyvoting.com, ,
> http://www.Surveyandballotsystems.com
>
> ,http://www.Surveyandballotsystems.com, â??DirectVoteâ??, and a myriad
> of survey tools I use for my work) I
> agree that ElectionBuddy seems to be the best balance of
> affordable and
> legitimate :-). I like their customer list too.
> http://electionbuddy.com/public/customers
>
> ,http://electionbuddy.com/public/customers,
>
> With regards to equal access, I donâ??t think this Website (or
> others) are
> compliant with ADA guidelines (sec 508 I believe?), looks like
> their
> workaround is that somebody can *request* a paper ballot. As a
> co-op, I
> donâ??t know that we *need* to comply with section 508, but I
> would think the
> ability to request a paper ballot through their system is
> sufficient?
>
> - Lisa