[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: old laptop with windows xp
- To: http://www.gmail.com/~christopher1 (Chris), http://www.gmail.com/~drchrisbear (Chris), http://www.picis.com/~Chris (Chris)
- Subject: RE: old laptop with windows xp
- From: Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 09:55:16 -0700
- Keywords: our-San-Jose-phone-number
It depends on how long he plans to keep it. Mint 13 LTS will be supported
for only 3 more years.
LMDE is forever...
[I run LMDE on all my computers, except my Virtual Private Server
machine and my work computer.]
> From: Chris <http://www.picis.com/~Chris>
> Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 10:36:54 -0400
>
> I think the best version would be Linux Mint 13 Cinnamon(32-bit) since this
> version is Long term supported.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert [http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert]
> Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 9:56 AM
> To: Chris; Chris; Chris
>
> > From: Chris <http://www.picis.com/~Chris> > Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 09:13:17
> > -0400 > > Hi Robert, > > I have a friend who has an old laptop that
> > has Windows XP with a 1.73Ghz > processor and 1 gig of memory.
> >
> > I was thinking about replacing Windows XP with Linux Mint for him.
> >
> > What version of Linux Mint do you think would be best for a Windows user?
>
> If this person wants to keep this computer for the rest of his life, I would
> recommend Linux Mint Debian Edition.
>
> http://www.linuxmint.com/download_lmde.php
>
> I think with only 1 gig of memory, you'll have to stick with the 32-bit
> edition.
>
> > Would you recommend Cinnamon or MATE desktop environment?
>
> Unfortunately, both will be slow, regardless. There used to be LMDE XFCE and a
> Fluxbox edition, but they have been dropped.
>
> I use Mate. There's actually very little difference between Cinnamon and Mate.
> (Mate is a slightly more customizable.)
>
> It might be best to go with Cinnamon since it's based on gtk3, which is the
> latest release of gtk, despite it being a little slower. It has a higher
> probability of lasting longer.
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Chris