and since it's today, let me present you with 10 precious minutes. Not sure who's speaking - couldn't find it under a Redd Foxx search
Attachment:
aChristmasCarol.mp3
Description: audio/mpeg
On Dec 25, 2012, at 10:36 AM, <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> wrote: > --- On Mon, 12/24/12, Michael Kramer <http://www.pianospree.com/~mk> wrote: >> From: Michael Kramer <http://www.pianospree.com/~mk> >> Subject: Re: Happy 2012 Winter Solstice! >> To: "" <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> >> Date: Monday, December 24, 2012, 5:20 PM >> >> By "with the normals", I meant at >> noon. Wed is my work from home day. How about >> Thurs? > > Interesting. I guess this exercise of negotiating a lunch time is exposing factors in the modern workplace... > > As it turns out, Thurs is a work-at-home day for me! > > Could we go back to Monday 1/14 and, instead of "The Normals" time, could we just do an early lunch, say, 11:30am? > >> On Dec 24, 2012, at 4:22 PM, <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> >> wrote: >>> --- On Mon, 12/24/12, Michael Kramer <http://www.pianospree.com/~mk> >>> wrote: >>>> From: Michael Kramer <http://www.pianospree.com/~mk> >>>> Subject: Re: Happy 2012 Winter Solstice! >>>> To: "" <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> >>>> Date: Monday, December 24, 2012, 1:25 PM >>>> >>>> Will you look at that . . >>>> >>>> Monday is OK. my phone is 415 812 9225. I don't >>>> have yours. >>> >>> My cell phone is my-2011-job-search-phone-number. >>> >>>> Do you eat with The Normals at noon? >>> >>> You mean, my co-workers? Sometimes. >>> >>>> On Mondays I have >>>> a 1PM meeting. Tuesday is wide open. >>> >>> Tuesday is my work-at-home day. How about >>> Wednesday 1/16 instead so we'll have time to chat? >>> >>>> On Dec 24, 2012, at 8:32 AM, <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> >>>> wrote: >>>>> OMG, we work close! -- I'm at 7th & S B St. >>>>> >>>>> I was not planning to go to the office this week, I'll >>>>> be out most of next week, and looks like I have a few lunch >>>>> dates the week after that. >>>>> >>>>> I penciled you in for Monday 1/14. Would that >>>>> work for you? >