Re: [occupy-where-I-live] Residential picketing (fwd)

[Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>]

A shame.

I guess the ACLU is fallible.

That would be a good law to rescind.

 > From: Noelle <http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg>
 > Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 07:19:00 -0800 (PST)
 >
 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 07:11:34 -0800
 > From: Gilbert Villagran <http://www.sjsu.edu/~gilbert.villagran>
 > Reply-To: http://www.googlegroups.com/~occupy-where-I-live
 > To: http://www.googlegroups.com/~occupy-where-I-live
 > Subject: Re: [occupy-where-I-live] Residential picketing
 > 
 > hi Tom,
 > thanks for this important information.
 > --Gil
 > 
 > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:50 PM, LegalOSJ <http://www.gmail.com/~legalosj> wrote:
 >        Attorney Kyra Kazantzis has pointed out that Chapter 10.09 of
 >        the San
 >         Municipal Code prohibits targeted picketing at residential
 >        dwellings. It's a misdemeanor if you get convicted.
 >        In addition, the person(s) who live in the dwelling can sue and
 >        get
 >        damages, costs, attorneys fees, as well as a fine of $1,000.
 > http://where-I-live.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll?f=id$id=where-I-live%20Code%20of%20Ordinances%3Ar%3A6008$cid=ca$t=altmain-nf.htm$an=JD_Chapter10.09$3.0#JD_Chapter10.09
 >        Apparently, the Ca Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate
 >        District
 >        upheld that code section against a First Amendment challenge in
 >        1995
 >        (City of where-I-live v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County).
 >        - Tom
 >