[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Considered UNSOLICITED BULK EMAIL from you
- To: Dale Kiefling <http://www.gmail.com/~daleki>
- Subject: Re: Considered UNSOLICITED BULK EMAIL from you
- From: <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 11:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: http://www.skywriterhosting.com/~dale, http://www.box.com/~sabine
- Delivery-date: Sun, 06 May 2007 11:50:31 -0700
- Envelope-to: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert
--- Dale Kiefling <http://www.gmail.com/~daleki> wrote:
> I will check out the email for headers with bcc entries. Does this mean we
> need to make the procmail recipie smarter to handle those cases where email
> is BCC only?
Yes. I think the recipe said something like
:0w
*^TO\/somethingiforgot
{
...
}
What you'll wanna do is, right after the '}', put
:E:
keep
or something, so you can sort out all the mail that doesn't have a proper "To:"
or "Cc:". Look at the "keep" folder (you probably should make sure you set
MAILDIR so you know where the "keep" folder will be created :-)) and see if you
can see a pattern -- why it's not getting delivered.
> Sabine can you check the email that did not come over and see if it is BCC
> only?
>
> We are currently using ^TO in our recipie.
Excellent. That covers both "To:" and "Cc:", as well as "Resent-To:" and
"Resent-Cc:".
> Cheers,
> Dale