the money should be here, finally. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:49:28 -0400 From: http://www.ubs.com/~marie.steinman To: http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg Subject: RE: FW: Wire instructions to your UBS in EUROS I talked to the accountant Mrs Benoit at he notaire . She received the fax. She said she will do the wire tomorrow. I will check on her tomorrow again and follow up with you. Best regards,
Marie Steinman Vice President - InvestmentsUBS Financial Services Inc. 131 So. Rodeo Drive, Suite 200Beverly Hills, CA 90212-2428 Tel: 310-281-3803 Fax: 310-281-4644 Toll-Free: 800-545-8914 http://www.ubs.com/~marie.steinman
-----Original Message-----From: Noelle [http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 6:27 PM
To: Steinman, Marie Subject: RE: FW: Wire instructions to your UBS in EUROS I faxed the documents and it apparently went through. Let me know if it did not. merci! --NG On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 http://www.ubs.com/~marie.steinman wrote:
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:00:20 -0400 From: http://www.ubs.com/~marie.steinman To: http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg Subject: RE: FW: Wire instructions to your UBS in EUROS Yes - I meant fax the instructions to the notaire and email me please the phone number of the notaire, with the name ! thanks Best regards, > Marie Steinman
From http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert Thu Apr 26 01:15:15 2007
Old-content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="----------=_1177575001-29181-12"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-Path: <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on b.spam.sonic.net X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS autolearn=disabled version=3.1.8 Received: from b.mx.sonic.net (b.mx.sonic.net [209.204.159.4]) by eth0.b.lds.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l3Q8B0nl003294 for <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:11:00 -0700 Received: from m1.dnsix.com (m1.dnsix.com [63.251.83.84]) by b.mx.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l3Q8AvSY013305 for <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:11:00 -0700 Received: from [38.113.6.61] (helo=monkey.sneakemail.com) by m1.dnsix.com with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>) id 1Hh00D-0003Rv-7I for http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 05:11:01 -0400 Received: (qmail 24368 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2007 08:10:56 -0000 Received: from heffalump.snafu.priv.at (HELO cft.snafu.priv.at) (150.101.178.147) by mail.sneakemail.com with SMTP; 26 Apr 2007 08:10:54 -0000 Received: from cft.snafu.priv.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cft.snafu.priv.at (8.13.8/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id l3Q8A2nv012217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:10:02 +1000 Received: (from az@localhost) by cft.snafu.priv.at (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) id l3Q8A10Z012214 for http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:10:01 +1000 Message-Id: <http://www.cft.snafu.priv.at/~200704260810.l3Q8A10Z012214> To: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robertSubject: Re: kuvert In-reply-to: Your message of "24 Apr 2007 14:32:37 GMT." <http://dummy.us.eu.org/13844-robert> Reply-To: "Alexander Zangerl az-at-snafu.priv.at |200705kuvert_gpg|" <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:09:33 +1000 Sender: http://www.heffalump.snafu.priv.at/~az X-Mailer: kuvert 1.1.10 Old-content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="----------=_1177575001-29181-12"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Sneakemail-Label: 200705kuvert_gpg X-Sneakemail-Address: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert X-Sneakemail-Rcpt: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robertX-Sneakemail-Keyword: X-Sneakemail-Return-Path: http://www.cft.snafu.priv.at/~az
From: Alexander Zangerl <http://www.snafu.priv.at/~az> X-Sneakemail-Return-Phrase: robert b X-Sneakemail-Is-Sneakemail: yes X-Sneakemail-Folder-Path: Desktop X-Sneakemail-Inc-Phrase: "robert b" X-to: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (Robert) Old-Priority: D X-header-match: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert Status: OR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 24 Apr 2007 14:32:37 GMT, "robert b" writes:
For me, it would be sufficient to have multiple kuvert's running simultaneously with an option to connect to the relevant one via environment variables before kuvert_mta_wrapper is called. (This is what I do with pgpsendmail.)
urks, inelegant what with separate queues etc. as i said, i'm about to add nice from-dependent to kuvert, that should work cleaner. regards az