[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Denesh Desouza
- To: noelle
- Subject: Re: Denesh Desouza
- From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (Robert)
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:45:27 -0800
- Keywords: http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg
> From: Noelle <http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg>
> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:07:16 -0800 (PST)
>
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Robert wrote:
>
> > Date: 29 Jan 2007 10:42:43 -0800
> > From: Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
> > To: http://dummy.us.eu.org/noelleg
> >
> > What's interesting is that he's arguing for moral relativism.
> >
> > It's funny is that this is exactly the opposite of what Sam Harris seems
> > to argue.
>
> I don't know about that. He doesn't buy into the clash of civilizations
> argument, but i think he believes our morality is lacking, though he seems to
> prefer living here than in more moral India.damn, I'm not really sure what he
> thinks.
Well, he thinks liberals believing in moral relativism are just wrong and
it's always wrong (for example) to burn brides.
I think Desouza is wrong and Harris is right. I presume that Dawkins
would also be against moral relativism as well, 'tho that's less clear.
> Wilbur came over to thank you for calling.He didn't see any break-in signs.They
> couldn't hear your phone call at 3 am.
All that lost sleep over nothing???
Anyway, how'd your test go?