[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Macs & gcc
- To: "K. gnarup" <http://www.gmail.com/~kgnarup>
- Subject: Re: Macs & gcc
- From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (Robert)
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:23:53 -0700
- Keywords: http://www.gmail.com/~kgnarup
> From: "K. gnarup" <http://www.gmail.com/~kgnarup>
> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 14:13:27 -0700
>
> On 20 Apr 2006 13:09:21 -0700, Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> wrote:
> > I actually don't. But, "fink" does and it works fine. XCode 2.2 seems to
> > be installed. Is that what you're using?
>
> I am using 2.1. The download for 2.2 is too big. I am using gcc 3.3 now.
>
> I've been trying to install ruby+rails since this morning, still not done.
> This is ridiculous.
...especially on Mac! It was almost made for Mac!
This is the real problem with OSX 10.4 -- there is no good package system.
The DMGs are nice, but there doesn't seem to be a dependency system. fink
is really great, but it works outside the main OSX framework so its
applications are a bit cumbersome to use. There's probably a pkgsrc
package for MacOS. That would be a sufficient compromise.
Ya know, maybe while I was talking with the ex-director of OSX
development, I should have brought this up. After all, I obviously had
nothing to lose :-).