[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cleaning house
- To: "kathryn m" <http://www.kathaus.org/~cat>
- Subject: Re: cleaning house
- From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (Robert)
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:14:36 -0800
- Keywords: http://www.kathaus.org/~cat
> From: "kathryn m" <http://www.kathaus.org/~cat>
> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 17:02:29 -0800
>
> ---------- Original Message -----------
> From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (Robert)
> To: "kathryn m" <http://www.kathaus.org/~cat>
> Sent: 19 Feb 2006 07:38:18 -0800
> Subject: Re: cleaning house
>
> [ . . . ]
I agree with everything you say here.
> > But, then, I wouldn't ever vote
> > because no candidate and no proposition would ever
> > exactly fit my beliefs.
>
> my difficulty is that the whole process is flawed. on one
> level, there is the lack of real choice. but even if there
> were a real choice, if your candidate loses you're
> sunk, you have no way to fight because you agreed to
> the terms of the vote in the first place.
I guess your proposition or whatever losing is a loss within the voting
system. I suppose you have to go outside the system once you're in that
position. Or try again. (Speaking of which, someone at the Trader Joes
accosted us with a petition for putting that "Parental Notification"
proposition back on the ballot. Some people just have too much money.)
> also, how can
> someone truly represent me? no one can. if a
> decision affects me i want a say in it. i don't want to try
> to get some politician to listen to me. he is paid by the
> system and is thus beholden to it, not to me.
Then, this is inherently a problem with representative democracy because,
aside from corruption, a politician is beholden to her constituency.
But, of course, the other unspoken part of the problem is concentration of
decision power -- either in the form of the representative or the
enforcement of a proposition by police/judges/lawyers. I guess this
really comes down to the old community versus the individual argument,
and, ultimately, trust -- whether the individual trusts the politician or
the wisdom of the community or neither.
Maybe it's also the size of the community. If it's too large, you no
longer have a choice to choose a different community if you don't like the
decisions made in that community. I guess this would be a good argument
for a weak state government and an even weaker federal government. I
guess this is the Thomas Jefferson view.
Anyway, just a brain spew. I need to make dinner now.
> not a problem. sorry you didn't sleep.
> take care,
> kathryn