|   
  
  
    |  |  |  |  
    |  |  
    |  |  
    | Alerting Humanitarians to 
      Emergencies |  |  
    |  |  
  
  
    |  | 
 
        
        
          | 
              
              By 
            Maggie Fox, Health and Science Correspondent
            WASHINGTON, Sept 23 (Reuters) - Consumer advocates backed by 
            some prominent doctors and researchers on Thursday questioned a new 
            U.S. policy recommending wider use of statin drugs to lower 
            cholesterol.
            The new guidelines, published in July, suggest that people 
            who once thought their cholesterol levels were fine should take 
            statin drugs to get them even lower.
            The National Institutes of Health and the National 
            Cholesterol Education Program panel that issued the guidelines cited 
            several studies showing that people who used statins greatly lowered 
            their risk of heart disease.
            But the Center for Science in the Public Interest disputed 
            the interpretation of the studies and accused the panel members of 
            having been influenced by their connections to drug companies.
            "There is strong evidence to suggest that an objective, 
            independent reevaluation of the scientific evidence from the five 
            new studies of statin therapy would lead to different conclusions 
            than those presented by the current NCEP," reads the CSPI letter, 
            signed by 35 cardiologists, nutritionists and other health 
            professionals.
            "The studies cited do not demonstrate that statins benefit 
            women of any age or men over 70 who do not already have heart 
            disease," said John Abramson, a clinical instructor in primary care 
            at Harvard Medical School, who signed the letter.
            "Furthermore, we are concerned about the findings from one of 
            the five cited studies showing that statin therapy significantly 
            increases the risk of cancer in the elderly."
            The new guidelines say that high-risk people -- who have had 
            a heart attack, diabetes, chest pain, or surgery to clear blocked 
            blood vessels -- should aim for a low-density lipoprotein or "bad" 
            cholesterol level of 70 instead of the usual 100.
            Those considered at moderate risk are now told to take drugs 
            if their LDL is 130 or above.
            The guidelines do mention that lifestyle changes can lower 
            cholesterol too, and say that drugs should not be prescribed without 
            advice to exercise and eat more fruits, vegetables and fiber and 
            less fat.
            But the CSPI letter says the guidelines give this advice only 
            a cursory mention.
            "Eight of the nine authors of the July recommendations have 
            financial ties to statin manufacturers, including Pfizer (Inc. 
            <PFE.N>), Merck (and Co. Inc. <MRK.N>), Bristol-Myers 
            Squibb <BMY.N>, and AstraZeneca <AZN.L> -- a fact that 
            was not disclosed when the recommendations were first published in 
            the journal Circulation," the letter reads.
            Many researchers have financial ties to drug companies but 
            the issue has received more prominence in recent years as groups 
            such as the CSPI question whether such relationships may influence 
            medical research.
            "We have abundant, strong evidence to support the ... 
            guidelines and we are in the process of formulating a response to 
            the CSPI," said Susan Sagusti, a spokeswoman for the NIH's National 
            Heart, Lung and Blood Institute.
                | Group urges review of new U.S. statin drug 
                  advice 23 Sep 2004 22:12:05 
                  GMTSource: Reuters
 
 |  
  
 
 |  |  |  
  
  
    | © 1998-2001 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or 
      redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, 
      is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. 
      Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or 
      for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
 |  |