[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fw: Webcast Today: Protect you organization against next-gen spammers
- To: http://www.outformations.com/~drc, http://www.outformations.com/~dek
- Subject: Re: Fw: Webcast Today: Protect you organization against next-gen spammers
- From: Robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:05:31 -0700 (PDT)
Boy, this presentation was incredibly biased. IMHO, I think having a central
solution like Postini has a lot of downsides which weren't mentioned. For
example, there was no mention of where their "data centers" were located and
whether they are physically vulnerable (earthquake, etc.). Also, whether, if a
particular hole is discovered in the infrastructure, some set of people could
quickly take advantage of that before the hole is plugged up.
Their broader ideas are very good, 'though -- I just don't like the
implementation. The idea of having access to information of a number of
spam-fighters can be really useful. I just personally like the peer-to-peer
model (such as Cloudmark) better because it's more robust and more
customizeable. (I think Cloudmark's implementation needs some work, too,
'though.)
It seems like the domains-oriented service that Postini offers is so low-cost
that they will probably be the long-term winners of this. OTOH, once a SPF or
Domain Keys solution is implemented, such services will gradually become less
desired and other home-grown solutions (probably peer-to-peer or RBL-oriented)
will sprout.