--- Andreas Oesterhelt <http://www.oesterhelt.org/~oes> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > > > I'll try to clean up and commit my changes ASAP > > > (which means probably mid > > > next week) so there is a defined point to start > > > from. > > > > Sounds good. > > If you're still there & interested, I could commit my current changes and > send you the remaining feedback log (~200 items) on Monday. Sorry about waiting 'til now to get back to you. I have been trying to catch up on things. You could send me the feedback log and see if I can build some patterns from them. I assume that I'd do this on my local copy only; should I then send you the resulting default.action file? > > Sure. At some point in the past, I was wondering if > > this could be automated (i.e., regular expressions > > could be automatically derived), but after looking > > around on the web, I found nothing, unfortunately. > > I don't think that it'll ever be possible to automatically derive good > patterns from sample URLs (not without AI anyway), but I think that > verification of the patterns could be at least semi-automatic, which is > why the master AF file format is parseable. When at some point in the > future we need to expunge outdated patterns, it could be useful to hack up > something in Perl. Will always require manual verification though -- e.g > just that an Ebay auction or NYT news article has expired doesn't mean > that the ad delivery mechanism used to spice auctions/articles with ads > has also gone away. OK. > Best regards, > --Andreas