> From: Qi Xie <http://www.yahoo.com/~zoqix> > Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 07:56:21 -0800 (PST) > > >Did you feed in the .reg file that I sent? > > The .reg file is for windows isn't it? The other box > (client) is also > linux. Yes. Sorry. I didn't realize that you were using Linux on your other box. > > How do I resolve that then? (my client tried to get a > dhcp lease or ftp > using ip address to my server, my server activate the > link) OK, then probably something else is wrong. 1) Is your Linux host trying to do a reverse-lookups? The way to see this is to run "tcpdump" and look for both TCP & UDP traffic with port 53. 2) Are you running IP masquerading? > > Later, if I intend to add in local dns, won't that be > even more problematic? I run dnrd, Domain Name Relay Daemon, and it works like a charm. (It's not a real DNS server, 'though.) > -----Original Message----- > From: robert <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> > To: zoqix <http://www.yahoo.com/~zoqix> > Date: Friday, November 03, 2000 10:34 PM > Subject: Re: Configuring Diald on gateway > > > > From: "zoqix" <http://www.yahoo.com/~zoqix> > > > Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 07:40:35 +0800 > > > > > > Hi Robert, > > > > > > I know what went wrong now. Becos I cut and paste > your standard filter > from > > > WinWord and therefore it end up as an invalid file > for Linux. > > > I've solved that and tried out your > standard.filter on my system. > However, > > > there's still the same problem. When my client > tried to get a dhcp lease > or > > > ftp to my server, my server activate the link. > > > > > > Even if I do a "ftp 192.168.5.1" from my client > (192.168.5.2). Has it > got > > > something to do with dns lookups? > > > >I suspect so. > > > > > But I'm using ip addr here, not name. > > > >It doesn't matter. > > > > > How > > > do I resolve that? > > > >Did you feed in the .reg file that I sent? > > > > > > > > And what if later I want to use something like > "ftp pc1" (pc1 is the > > > server), do I have to edit the filter to take into > account dns lookup at > > > local network? > > > >No. It shouldn't matter. > > > > > > > > May I know what is the meaning of the following > statements? > > > > > > ignore udp > udp.dest=udp.domain,udp.source=udp.domain > > > accept udp 90 udp.dest=udp.domain > > > ignore udp udp.source=udp.domain > > > >This says to bring up the line for a DNS lookup, > unless either both the > >source is a domain lookup (i.e., a zone transfer is > happening, although > >most zone transfers happens via TCP, not UDP). > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "robert" <http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert> > > > To: "zoqix" <http://www.yahoo.com/~zoqix> > > > Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 10:53 PM > > > Subject: Re: Configuring Diald on gateway > > > > > > > > From: "zoqix" <http://www.yahoo.com/~zoqix> > > > > > Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 07:29:38 +0800 > > > > > > > > > > Hi Robert, > > > > > > > > > > I noticed your "Yes, But..." answers to some > of my qns. May I know > > > "But" > > > > > what? > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > But...that the problem is probably your DNS > lookups, not the standard > > > > diald set-up. > > > > > > > > > From: "zoqix" <http://www.yahoo.com/~zoqix> > > > > > Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 16:28:40 +0800 > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I've tried using your standard.filter and it > works fine without > > > bringing up > > > > > the link for my intranet communication. > > > > > However, when I tried to access external > network like typing > > > www.redhat.com > > > > > at my web browser, the link doesn't come up > too. > > > > > How do I resolve this? > > > > > > > > That's odd. Are you using IP masquerading?