[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
formail -D & -n (was Procmail Version 3.14 released)
- To: Philip Guenther <http://www.gac.edu/~guenther>
- Subject: formail -D & -n (was Procmail Version 3.14 released)
- From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (robert)
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 15:06:55 +0000
- In-Reply-To: <199911230715.http://www.solen.gac.edu/~BAA25423>
 > From: Philip Guenther <http://www.gac.edu/~guenther>
 > Date: Tue  Nov 23,  1:14am
 >
 >             Changes to formail:
 >                - Prevent corrupt idcaches by suppressing the -n option when
 >                  splitting with the -D option
Hi.  The above caught my eye.  I have some questions:
1) What if the "formail -D" is done inside a script specified by "formail -s",
   but the -n is also being used?  (I.e., "formail -n -s blah" where "blah"
   is doing a "formail -D".)  Will the ids get corrupted in that case as
   well?
2) Will this "feature" always persist in the future?  I currently use
   "formail -D #### messids -n ### -s" in one of my scripts and I find the -n
   feature great for my particular application.
(As it turns out, I was worrying about #1, and I happened to have found your
mail message in the procmail mail archive.  I was thinking of adding some
lock mechanism to assure that I avert the corruption problem.)
Thanks.
P.S. Feel free to forward this to the entire procmail list if you do not have
     time to address it.