[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Where are ms-dos filenames for Debian packages?
- To: http://www.aeat.co.uk/~John.Lines
- Subject: Re: Where are ms-dos filenames for Debian packages?
- From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (robert)
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 19:01:48 +0000
Hi.
Do you know of any efforts to make a UMSDOS system for Debian? If not,
do you know of any ways to fool the installation process so that it can?
(For example, saying that you're going to install to a particular drive,
but shell out before the installation copies to the drive and umount it
and remount it pointing to the DOS partition, maybe?)
> Date: 1999/03/02
> Author: John Lines <http://www.aeat.co.uk/~John.Lines>
>
> > I read somewhere that dpkg can handle "mangled" filenames because it
> looks
> > inside the package to determine if it is the correct version. Is
> dpkg what
> > I need to be learning to use?
> >
>
> It is certainly worth knowing how to use dpkg directly for one-off
> operations.
>
> >
> > CD-ROM is not an option. Modem is not an option. Are files in my
> > /hda3/debian (which is my Windows 3.1 c:\debian directory) an
> option?
> > That's where I rejoined the perl_5.004.04-6.deb file tht I'm trying
> to
> > install.
> >
> > Thanks for the on-list and off-list suggestions I've already
> received. The
> > idea about changing my ms-dos partition to a vfat partition which
> would
> > support long filenames is a good idea, but I don't know if that will
> help
> > me since I have Windows 3.1. Thanks for your patience. I'm trying to
> leap
> > from Windows 3.1 to Linux instead of following the path from Windows
> > 3.1...to Windows 95....to Windows 98....to an old Windows NT....to a
> new
> > Windows NT....to who-knows-what. The get-the-CD suggestion was also
> a good
> > suggestion but right now I'm trying to introduce myself to Linux on
> my
> > computer which has no CD before I make big changes to my other
> computer
> > which my family uses every day (it has Windows 3.1, also).
> >
> >
> It may be worth investigating the UMSDOS file system - this provides a
> Unix file system (with long file names) over an MSDOS filesystem. The
> Unix files live in an MSDOS directory, with a DOS file called
> something like linux.--- which holds the long filename and
> protection/ownership info etc; all the things that Unix likes which
> DOS does not have. The files themselves look to the DOS side of things
> like a truncated form of their long names.
>
> It is useful for people running in a mixed environment because it
> allows you to pinch space from your DOS partition and use it as real
> Unix space
>
>
> John Lines
>
>
> p.s. Slackware had support for a UMSDOS boot disk - you could run with
> no 'real' Linux partition at all. It would be very handy to have that
> in Debian at some stage.