I still have a desktop (pentium 75 running linux and win3.11) that I haven't turned on in several months. That is basically a good sign. Personally my wife and I find the smaller keyboard and screen a small price to pay to get the space savings (yet to be realized; no home yet for a perfectly good p-75 and 17" monitor) and flexibility to move about the house and to and from wherever we happen towant to go to work. Some issues: 1. I'm only familiar with the NEC Versa laptops of which we've had 3 since 1994 (two still in use). They are considered to be very expensive but I like them. The power is now there (you can get a PIII with 14G hard drive and all the peripherals, etc) it's just a question of cost. There are cheaper laptops than NEC, but it's still a question of cost, not functionality. 2. backup is now jaz drive. With a scsi pcmcia card theoretically any backup device is viable. 3. One distinct advantage is a laptop with removable hard drive. This way, I can put in a new drive and experiment with different OS's and if it doesn't work, at the end of the day I can just switch hard drives. You can do it with desktops, but laptops are much more oriented to swapping devices in and out. 4. NT sucks on the laptop. I don't know if it's my inexperience or just NT in general but win95/98 is much better (e.g. hot-swapping pcmcia cards, power management, going to sleep, etc) Hope this helps. robert wrote: > Hi. I saw your Usenet posting posted about a year ago about replacing all > your desktop machines with laptops. I was thinking of doing the same thing. > Did you actually do this? Is it working out? > > -- > From: Frederick Schmidt <http://www.ibm.net/~fschmidt> > Date: Mon Aug 9, 1:48pm > . . . > Hope this helps. Yes! Very much so! Thanks!