It's unfortunate that Ted Lewis ("The Open Source Acidity Test", Computer, Binary Critic, Feb 1999) does not understand the difference between "freeware" and "free software" (or "open source"). Open source is not freeware -- open source licenses only requires that the source code be available for free (or at a nominal distribution code), not the binaries. Just because the price of open source distributions (such as Red Hat Linux) is increasing due to the hiring of programmers does not mean that the open source movement is doomed. In fact, the contrary is true: because outfits like Red Hat are hiring programmers, the quality of the software developed will only get better, even if the binaries become more expensive. Most important of all, the source code will always remain available.