Re: BLOCKFOLDER & passing through

[http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (robert)]

No, this is not what I want.  I want sb.rc to "fall through" instead of just
depositing the BLOCKed mail.  I.e., when I do:

INCLUDERC=sb.rc

I want to put stuff afterwards, such as:

:0w
*^x-sbclass: blocked
{
	:0:
	*B??keyword1
	$DEFAULT
	:E
	/dev/null
}
 
Again, this may (it looks like it would) involve a change to sb.rc.  In
fact, my proposed change is from:

:0:
* BLOCKTAG ?? yes
| ${FORMAIL} -A"X-SBClass: Blocked" >>${BLOCKFOLDER}

To:

:0f
* BLOCKTAG ?? yes
| ${FORMAIL} -A"X-SBClass: Blocked" 
:A:
*!BLOCKFOLDER??^$
$BLOCKFOLDER

See?

 > From: http://www.hrweb.org/~ariel (Catherine Hampton)
 > Date: Mon  Aug 24,  9:28am
 >
 > If you just set BLOCKFOLDER=${DEFAULT}, that will send all blocked email
 > back into your main mailbox, but with the Blocked: header intact.
 > 
 > Catherine
 > 
 > > I have a semi-unusual request.  Is there a way to trap (& trash as appropriate)
 > > spam messages, but pass through blocked mail?  What I mean is that currently
 > > if I set BLOCKFOLDER, blocked mail will go in there and the invocation of
 > > procmail will terminate.  What I would like instead is to, say, set
 > > BLOCKFOLDER to "" and have it only mark the message with "X-SBClass: Blocked"
 > > and fall through to the rest of my .procmailrc script so that I can process
 > > it further.
 > > 
 > > Can this be done with the current implementation of sb.rc?  If not, would
 > > you be willing to add such a feature?
 > > 
 > > Thanks.