[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: jove on xterms on Linux probs
- To: http://www.mimosa.com/~hugh ("D. Hugh Redelmeier")
- Subject: Re: jove on xterms on Linux probs
- From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (robert)
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 09:23:02 -0800
- In-Reply-To: <199610300505.http://www.mimosa.com/~AAA10931>
- XX-from: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (Robert)
> From: http://www.mimosa.com/~hugh ("D. Hugh Redelmeier")
> Date: Wed Oct 30, 12:05am
>
> | XX-from: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (Robert)
> | From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (Robert)
>
> This looks interesting. Is this some security thing?
No. It's because, if in some future date this account becomes disabled,
people may be bright [read: tricky] enough to use the http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert
account instead which will always be correct.
> | Sorry if this has already been asked, but I've been having problems with
> | 4.16beta.52 in xterms on Linux 2.0.0.
>
> Why not use the 4.16 non-beta?
I wanted to live on the cutting edge -- but I guess I'm bleeding while living
there, huh?
> | It seems that insert redisplay is
> | in correct. It appears that some sort of an insert mode is on, but that,
> | in addition to the actual character getting inserted, a space is also
> | inserted causing the display to be incorrect.
>
> This is a known (to me) bug in the LINUX termcap and terminfo
> databases.
>
> There are two capabilities for specifying insertion: insert mode
> entry/exit, and insert a character (or n characters). The specs of
> termcap say that if both capabilities are present, the program must
> use both, not one or the other. The author of the LINUX tables didn't
> understand this.
>
> In terminfo, for every entry that defines "smir", you should remove
> the "ich1" and "ich" capabilities. Actually, there might be terminals
> that really need both, but I don't know of any -- certainly not xterm
> or the LINUX console.
>
> In termcap, for every terminal description that defines "im", you
> should remove any "ic" and "IC" capabilities.
I'll do both of these...
> | Has this problem been fixed in a later version? Is this a known bug?
>
> I know it :-). I thought that I convinced the person who I thought
> was responsible, but there has been no change in the distributions
> that I use. Do you know the right way of reporting this problem?
>
> Hugh Redelmeier
> http://www.mimosa.com/~hugh voice: +1 416 482-8253