> From: Michael Carpenter <http://www.psa.pencom.com/~mikec> > Date: Thu Feb 13, 2:27pm > > If you check in settings, do you have the power to COM1 turned OFF in DOS????? Actually, this is from my PC. Standard DOS 5.0 does not seem to come with setup or a "serctl" command. I bought a $50 book explaining this stuff, but even the software that came included with it found no problems with the COM1, _except_ that the port IRQ was not enabled. When I used the software to enable it, doing "echo dir >com1" still failed. And, in fact, after I checked the IRQ again, it became disabled again! I also looked at the motherboard pamphlet and there do not seem to be any jumpers for the COM1 port. My next experiment is to see if I can send _anything_ from that COM1 port by booting up into Windows NT, connecting the COM1 port to my Linux machine, and try the "echo dir >com1" again. Sorry. This problem seems very off-topic from my original problem of trying to get LapLink working! > Mike > > Robert penned: > ->Hi. After talking with someone at Traveling Software, it seems that part > ->of my problem is that, when booting with a DOS 5.0 floppy, I do not have > ->access to the COM1 port, i.e., after booting into DOS, if the first thing I > ->do is: > -> > ->A:> echo dir >com1 > -> > ->I get: > -> > ->Write fault error writing device COM1 > ->Abort, Retry, Ignore, Fail? > -> > ->When I try the same thing after booting into Windows NT, I get no errors. > -> > ->According to the guy at Traveling Software, I should be able to do this > ->from DOS without error. This may be a purely DOS question, but does > ->anyone know why this would be failing? Are there any fixes? > -> > > . . . > > > -- > ___ ____ __ > | _ \/ __/| \ http://www.pencom.com/~mikec > | _/\__ \| \ \ Michael A. Carpenter > |_| /___/|_|__\ PSA AnswerDesk - Austin Texas (512) 343-8888 > Pencom System Administration: http://www.pencom.com