[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: testing for only the subject and the body
- To: http://www.wwa.com/~dattier (David W. Tamkin)
- Subject: Re: testing for only the subject and the body
- From: http://dummy.us.eu.org/robert (robert)
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 16:36:39 -0700
- In-Reply-To: <http://www.miso.wwa.com/~m0wcJFl-000k2HC>
- References: <http://www.miso.wwa.com/~m0wcJFl-000k2HC>
 > From: http://www.wwa.com/~dattier (David W. Tamkin)
 > Date: Thu  Jun 12,  6:26pm
 >
 > | Your solution works great!  Thanks!
 > 
 > You're welcome, but which of my suggestions did you use?  There were two
 > completely different approaches.
The non-scoring version.  It fitted better into my existing approach.
However, I may use the scoring version in my "junk mail" catcher.
 > | P.S. How did you know my last name is"?  Was/is there something in the
 > |      header which says this?
 > 
 > No, but either there used to be or you used to sign your full name to posts
 > to the Procmail List; I remember it from then.
Ah, quite likely.
 > Either that or all those Bobby Sherman and David Soul records on the 70s
 > station reminded me of your work with them in _Here_Come_the_Brides_ (sorry,
 > didn't watch _Primus_; it made me seasick).
I didn't even know I ever collaborated with these people! :)
Again, thank you.